|
1) Just Ask God For Help: A Testimony
2) Talk Radio Discusses the Book
3) Evolutionist Admits Big Bang Belief Takes Faith
4) The Book Goes Into Historical Archives
5) The Wickliffe, Ohio, Public Library Incident
6) The Cleveland Museum of Natural History is Challenged
7) Scientist Acts More Like Angry Atheist
8) Evolutionist Questions His Evolutionary Beliefs
9) Creation Talk At the Euclid Public Library
10) Bible-Bashing at The Cleveland Museum of Natural History
11) Back on the Airwaves
12) Power Point Talking Once Again
13) The Creation TV Show
Just Ask God For Help: A Testimony
In July of 2007 I was diagnosed with Melanoma Skin Cancer. I'd seen a small mark on my back in January, but I didn’t get to the doctor to have it checked. Instead, I waited 6 months before going to the hospital, even though the small mark had increased significantly in size. This delay would literally change my life forever. For when I finally had the growth removed, I was told it was Melanoma, and it was deep in my back and the situation was extremely serious.
I immediately went online to check out exactly what Melanoma Skin Cancer was? After reading about it, my hopes of walking away from this situation with a clean bill of health were very, very bleak.
I had an appointment to see a surgeon, Dr. Julian Kim, on July 18 at University Hospital. But that morning at 5:00, I had what I can only describe as “A Moment To Remember.” I was restless all night as I thought about a number of things: was my life going end in a matter of months? How would my family handle it? What would happen to my 2 dogs and 12 cats? I had a virtual knot in my stomach, which made me as restless as I’ve ever been in my entire life.
Well, I couldn’t take it any longer, so I rose out of bed and began pacing the room while, at the same time, calling out to God for help. I said:
Oh Lord, I know that I’ve gotten myself into this situation, and whatever happens in the future will be totally my fault. So I’m not making excuses and blaming anyone else.
So Lord, here’s all I’m asking now. In spite of my foolishness, and no matter what happens to me from this point on, can You show me the way to handle this without being all knotted up inside? Up to this point I’ve failed myself, my loved ones, friends, and the pets that depend on me for their survival. I really let all of them down by waiting so long to get this problem checked out. I realize now that we’re obligated to take care of ourselves, not only for our own benefit, but for the benefit of those that love and depend on us. For when we are hurt, others are hurt as well. That’s something I really never thought too seriously about, until now.
Lord, I know I can’t go back in time and change anything. I’m in this spot and that’s the way it is. I’m not the first and I’m not going to be the last who finds themselves in such a situation. We’re humans, and can be very foolish at times, even when it comes to our own health. I made the mistake of not going to the doctor when I saw something was wrong. So now, let me not make another mistake and be worried and restless about it, because that’s not going to help me get well. That can only hurt me, which in turn can hurt my family and others. I don’t want to let them down a second time.
Lord, I’m asking that from this point on You comfort me. Let me relax and face this situation as best I can and accept the reality of where I’m at right now. If I’m going to be leaving soon or become very ill due to cancer, please give me the strength to make whatever happens that much easier for the people around me. Please give me the strength also to make sure that all of my pets will be cared for and not abandoned to fend for themselves. They need to stay right here in the house. Oh, and Lord, please tell my pa that his son is going to do what’s right from this point on to make the best out of this situation. Would you please tell him that for me Lord?
That talk with God really impacted me tremendously. From that point on I felt more relaxed in spite of my very uncertain future.
That morning I saw my surgeon, He told me, in no uncertain terms, that I was in very serious medical trouble, and that surgery was needed as soon as possible. It was set for August 9.
In the meantime, I got busy at getting things in order just in case a sudden illness would overtake me. I drew up a will with instructions on what to do with all of my belongings, and of course I made arrangements that the pets would be properly cared for. After that I really felt terrific and much of the worry left me. I was sleeping soundly and wasn't afraid of what the future had in store for me.
To make a long story short, from the time I got the bad news on the biopsy, all news forthcoming was on the positive side as I kept telling myself it would be. Of course, I did make it a point to tell God that whatever He wanted for me is what I want for me. If He decided that my future on earth was to come to an end, then that’s okay with me.
However, the surgery went well, the cancer had not spread, and God continued to direct me to all of the wonderful people at University Hospitals who helped me, many of whom are still helping me today. Isn’t the Lord amazing? Thank you Almighty God. I’m internally grateful to You.
I stand before you knowing that the future is forever going to be filled with trips to the doctors on a regular basis to constantly check for any reoccurrence of the Melanoma. But, considering what could have happened, I certainly feel that each and every day is a bonus which, under the circumstances, I probably don’t deserve.
I’m now busy at getting the word out about how God created mankind in His own image and that Jesus Christ is every persons Lord and Savior. We just can’t get to Heaven without Him
Whenever you’re in trouble, just ask God to help you. Talk to Him. Tell Him your problems and ask Him to comfort you and show you the way to handle each and every situation. He’ll do it for you just like He did it for me. That’s a promise.
I thank you for reading this testimony and may God bless each and every one of you.
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Talk Radio Discusses the Book
It was my pleasure to be on the Pastor Ernie Sanders Radio Program: What’s Right? What’s Left? 1220AM on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 from 9 to 10:30PM. It was a great opportunity to discuss this wonderful book that helps point out the numerous scientific inaccuracies stated by The Cleveland Museum of Natural History, an historic institution located at One Wade Oval Dr., University Circle, Cleveland, Ohio.
The conversation was lively. I got my points across concerning the Museum’s evolutionary exhibits, which are making statements of “faith” as opposed to statements of “science.” This was the entire purpose of the book
For the first hour Pastor Sanders gave his views on the text. I periodically chimed in with points of interest, which enabled me to give the listener a good indication of what they could expect when reading GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On?. In the last half-hour of the program we took a couple of very informative calls.
I told the listeners that, in Chapter Seven: Thinking We’re Apes Leads To Ape-Like Thinking, I demonstrate how the belief in evolutionary theory, particularly human evolution, has been the major reason why child-killing (abortion) is legal in our country. Laws never could have been passed had a great number of scientists back in 1973 promoted the idea that a baby in the womb is a creation of God Almighty and is sacred in every way, shape, and form.
I reminded everyone that, how we think of ourselves and our human origin, usually dictates what moral values we'll adhere to. For instance, if a person truly believes they’ve descended from an ape-like creature by random evolutionary processes, then they, more often than not, will be pro-child killing and also in favor of same-sex marriages.
I pointed out the Bible’s scientific accuracy where it tells us the universe had a beginning (Gen 2:1-2), the earth is round (Isaiah 40:22), it’s suspended in space (Job 26:7), and that there are trillions of stars in the universe (Gen 22:17 and Jeremiah 33:22).
I mentioned the numerous Bible-believing scientists who played a major role in the writing of my book: Jonathan Sarfati, Walt Brown, Henry Morris, Carl Wieland, John Woodmorappe, Kent Hovind, Werner Gitt, David Menton, and Don Batten, etc. All these people have worthy scientific credentials.
Pastor Sanders is truly a Godly man who, in the past 30 years, has rescued thousands of unborn children from certain death at the hands of many a child-killer who’ve slaughtered millions of innocent babies since the infamous Roe v. Wade decision. But thank God for people like Pastor Sanders, Pastor Dale Henkel, and the thousands of other Pro-Life men and women who fight daily to save the unborn. Without them, the death toll would be far higher than it currently is today, as horrific as that is to comprehend.
It was an exciting and worthwhile evening on What’s Right? What’s Left? with host Pastor Ernie Sanders. I hope to have the pleasure of being on his program once again in the not so distant future.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Evolutionist Admits Big Bang Belief Takes Faith
On Thursday, November 15, 2007 I attended a lecture at The Cleveland Museum of Natural History. It was the first time I ever heard The Big Bang Theory discussed by a scientist who admitted that nothing about it can be proven to be a scientific fact. However, he nonetheless believes it still took place billions of years ago.
Dr. Romeel Dave is from the University of Arizona. He stated many things about the universe; pointing out that it originally came into existence by way of a quantum vacuum, it evolved over billions of years via cosmological evolution, that black holes and dark matter actually exist, galaxies collide with one another, and some other very interesting things dealing with the world of astronomy.
But I was very surprised to hear Dr. Dave, while speaking on these cosmological theories, every now and then made it clear to the audience that these things cannot be proven scientifically, and that he also believes the universe doesn’t look like it should based on The Big Bang model he supports.
This was the first time I ever heard an evolutionist readily admit that, much of what he believes concerning Big Bang cosmology, cannot be proven by using any current scientific method. This was a breath of fresh air and a huge change from what I’m used to hearing at The Cleveland Museum of Natural History's scientific lectures.
During the question & answer session, a woman asked Dr. Dave (and I’m paraphrasing here because I didn’t actually record this event): “How much of what you said is fact and how much is just opinion?” I was surprised that anyone would ask such a question because, quite frankly, in all of the lectures I’ve attended at this scientific institution, the Q & A part very rarely brings out such a negative question.
Dr. Dave, who laughed rather embarrassingly (laughs were heard from the audience as well), to his great credit readily admitted that these areas of cosmology can’t be proven to be scientific facts. I, for one, certainly was glad to hear him pronounce that so boldly.
Yet, Dr. Dave, perhaps trying to save face, stated what a lot of evolutionists proclaim whenever they talk about evolutionary theories, and that is that “gravity is a theory as well” (The Theory of Gravity). I immediately thought how unscientific such a statement is. After all, just because two things are referred to as “theories,” doesn’t mean that both theories are supported equally by scientific evidence.
The Theory of Gravity is not questioning the actual existence of gravity itself. Not at all. Anyone with common sense knows positively that gravity does exist. Its existence is a proven scientific fact that simply cannot be refuted.
The Theory of Gravity simply deals with questions like: where gravity originally come from or how it came to control much of the universe today?
The Big Bang Theory deals primarily with one question: did this cosmic event actually take place? So it’s a given that gravity exists, but it’s just a theory, or idea, that The Big Bang actually happened. That’s why it’s wrong to even compare The Theory of Gravity to The Big Bang Theory. Yet, sadly, evolutionists do this often. It’s their way of trying to tell the public that, since gravity exists, The Big Bang must have existed billions of years ago as well.
Today there are thousands of scientists who believe, based on sound scientific evidence and common sense, that the massive explosion that evolutionists say took place billions of years ago, actually never happened at all. Also, these same scientists point out, as Dr. Dave did, that the universe certainly doesn't look like it's the product of a Big Bang, which I also demonstrate in the book GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On?
All in all, I was happy to finally hear an evolutionist like Dr. Dave admit that his reasons for believing in The Big Bang Theory are based on things he simply cannot prove.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
The Book Goes Into Historical Archives
On November 7, 2007 I sent a copy of GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On? to The Western Reserve Historical Society in Cleveland, Ohio. I pointed out that the Museum (which I’m a member of) has every right to promote an evolutionary world-view (universe came out of a Big Bang, life came from non-life, and humans evolved from apes). However, when the institution uses exhibits stating that cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are absolute scienitific facts, then I have a serious problem with that.
I also mentioned that I’m doing all I can to get this book out to the public, especially to the young and very impressionable kids who visit this museum of natural history via the surrounding public school systems.
I mentioned the 50-minute Power Point Presentation that I give on the book, which I’d be happy to do at the Historical Society. This Presentation is dynamite and really points out the numerous flaws our museum of natural history is presenting. A ten-year-old child could see this Presentation and then, upon visiting the Museum, they would say: “Yeah, that exhibit doesn't make much sense.” I challenged the Historical Society to read the book and tell me where I’m wrong.
Considering how the text singles out the Museum, it therefore is the first of its kind and, hopefully, will not be the last book on the Museum.
So I thank The Western Reserve Historical Society for accepting this wonderful book into its archives. God Willing, I'll wtite another one some day soon.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
The Wickliffe, Ohio, Public Library Incident
I wanted this book available in the Wickliffe, Ohio, Public Library. But the Library refused to accept it. Obviously, I was stunned that any library would refuse such a book. A Shaker Heights and Geauga County Library in Ohio certainly thought it worthy enough to be included in their collections. However, concerning the Wickliffe Public Library, let me tell you what took place when I tried to sell them a copy.
On October 4 I went there and submitted my book for purchase. As I entered the Library parking lot I noticed the words of Thoreau emboldened on the side of the building: “BOOKS ARE THE TREASURED WEALTH OF THE WORLD.”
“Great!” I thought to myself. “Here’s a place where GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On? will be most welcomed.” Diane, the gal inside who took the copy, said she’d get back to me concerning its purchase.
I didn’t hear from Diane for almost two weeks, so I decided to phone. I asked her if my book had been accepted? She said: “I haven’t had a chance to look at it yet . . . Oh, here it is. It’s a good thing you called because it would have gotten buried.” I figured something was odd at that point. She then stated: “I’ll look it over and get back to you with a decision.” I thanked her and said goodbye.
Thirty minutes later I received a message on my answering machine that the book had been rejected and I could pick it up at the front desk. Obviously, Diane didn’t even bother to read the text prior to refusing it.
I went down and got the book. I asked Diane why it was rejected. She said: “It’s [the book] not right for a library.” I couldn’t believe what I heard so I asked her to repeat what she said and, sure enough, she did. I thought it very strange that this book, which is about one of Cleveland’s most significant scientific institutions, could be rejected so callously by any librarian. “It’s not right for a library.” I thought to myself: “What on earth was she thinking?”
Days later, I went back to the Library and noticed, right there in the open, dozens of those romantic paperback novels that are just dripping with adultery and other sexual perversions. I said to myself: “These kind of books must be good for a library.” And, to top it off, as you enter the Wickliffe Public Library you have only to turn to your left to find SCENE MAGAZINE. A “free” magazine that’s just loaded with ads for sexually perverted strip clubs and bars, sex-line phone numbers, and other sexually oriented material. I thought: “SCENE is right for the Wickliffe Public Library, but my book, which teaches children scientifically that they’re made in God’s Image and that they should live by His great moral laws, is not allowed in the Wickliffe Public Library.” Now that’s very interesting and puzzling when you really think about it.
When I see these kinds of decisions being made by people who are supposed to be looking out for our youth, it really frightens me. As an America citizen of high moral conscious, I feel it my duty to inform the public about such appalling decisions. This will be done via this website and any lectures I do on GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On?
The City of Wickliffe, with its many children/teenagers, deserves a library that adheres to what Thoreau stated: “BOOKS ARE THE TREASURED WEALTH OF THE WORLD.” However, currently the Wickliffe Public Library is allowing numerous sexual books and a very sexually explicit tabloid magazine onto its property while, at the same, banning a book that could only help to improve the mind and morals of our youth.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History is Challenged
On November 8, 2007 I sent a letter to Dr. Bruce Latimer, the Executive Director of The Cleveland Museum of Natural History, issuing a challenge to the institution to defend its many evolutionary beliefs. Here's the letter in its entirety:
Dr. Latimer:
I’m the author of the most recent book GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On? that’s making its way around Cleveland. Back on October 30 I was a guest on What’s Right? What’s Left?, a radio program hosted by Pastor Ernie Sanders. It airs Monday thru Friday on 1220AM from 9PM to 10:30PM.
The text simply points out that the Museum is making far too many exhibit statements where things are promoted as scientific “facts” when, in reality, they’re just scientific “opinions.”
For instance, the Museum’s Big Bang Exhibit states that even “Time” was created by this massive explosion that the Museum says took place billions of years ago. It’s okay for the Museum to make such a claim, but to say this is a fact of science is totally unscientific. No one, and I talk about this in the book, has a clue what “Time” actually is. So to claim how it was created is purely a statement of “faith” as opposed to one of “science.”
The book makes it clear that The Cleveland Museum of Natural History is confusing Historical/Origin Science with Observable/Operational Science. This is something no scientific institution should be doing.
Other Museum beliefs being promoted as facts (but cannot be proven scientifically to be so) are that the universe and earth are billions of years old, dinosaurs evolved over millions of years, and that humans evolved from ape-like creatures. I talked about this on the radio program and the Pastor mentioned that perhaps the Museum would select a representative to come onto the program in the future to defend these evolutionary positions.
If that could be arranged, then the program would consist of Pastor Ernie Sanders, myself, a scholarly scientist (perhaps one from the Answers in Genesis organization), and a Museum scientist who would have every opportunity to make his case that The Big Bang, life coming from non-life, and apes to man evolution are scientific “facts” and not just “opinions.”
This is a very important moment in the Museum’s history. It basically is the first time a book has ever been written that directly challenges the evolutionary exhibits the institution displays.
The book is currently available at the Cleveland State University Bookstore, Tri-C East and Metro Campuses Bookstores, the Family Christian Store on Rt. 20 in Mentor, and online at the book’s website. I also do a 50-minute Power Point Presentation about the book.
If you’d choose to have the Museum partake in this radio program there would be ample time for all parties to prepare for it. I can be reached via the following information below.
In closing, I’d just like to say that I attend many lectures at the Museum (of which I’m a member) and it’s always nice to see you up at the podium presenting your usual warm welcome to the audience. You strike me as a very honorable and good man. It’s just that we differ immensely on how the universe, earth, and all life forms got here in the first place. Those are the things that need to be discussed.
Thanks for reading my letter, hope to hear from you soon, and may God be with you and yours always.
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Scientist Acts More Like Angry Atheist
I’d like to make some comments concerning Dr. Lawrence Krauss’ article entitled: Museum of Misinformation Posing As Science that appeared in The Cincinnati Enquirer on May 19, 2007. Concerning the new Answers in Genesis Creation Museum opening up in Petersburg, Kentucky on Monday, May 28th, Dr. Krauss asked:
How much money and glitz does it take to institutionalize a scientific lie?
In answer to that question Dr. Krauss can simply ask The Cleveland Museum of Natural History who, for decades, has been showing artists illustrations of the extinct apes (australopithecines) that are totally unlike what the fossil evidence supports these creatures as being. The Museum shows them as literal “apemen,” complete with human hands, arms, feet, ankles, legs, backs, and necks even though the fossil evidence shows them looking almost identical to modern apes. These australopithecines are portrayed in this fashion in other museums of natural history, as well as in all of the human evolutionary books I’ve come across in my 55 years of living. Don’t believe me? Go to the library and look through the human evolutionary books and see for yourself how they “institutionalize a scientific lie” concerning what the australopithecines looked like in life.
Concerning the Creation Museum, Dr. Krauss goes on to say:
This will be a supernatural history museum, denying most, if not all, of natural history on this planet as centuries of careful study and experimentation have revealed it.
Just what “careful study and experimentation” is Dr. Krauss talking about that proves the universe, with its trillions and trillions of tons of matter, originally came out of nothing, caused by nothing, and then organized itself into an entity that’s a zillion times more complex than any computers NASA has ever built? Actually, there is no such “careful study and experimentation” that’s ever been done that proves such an impossible, unscientific scenario has ever taken place.
Concerning the Bible he states:
The historical record in Genesis, as interpreted by Ken Ham.
First, I’d like to inform the reader that it’s “Dr.” Ken Ham (the Creation Museum’s founder) whom Dr. Krauss is writing about here. His not referring to him as “Dr.” is just another way for Dr. Krauss to belittle anyone who doesn’t believe in the scientifically impossible scenarios that he adheres to. Secondly, Dr. Ham is not interpreting the Bible at all. He’s simply explaining what the writer(s) of Genesis are clearly telling the reader: that God created everything in 6-24 hour days. There’s simply nothing to interpret here.
Dr. Krauss believes that to deny evolution is to deny modern science. He states:
Since this [creation] is incompatible with essentially all of modern scientific knowledge, therefore modern scientific knowledge must be incorrect.
That’s not true at all. The Bible’s six-day creation account is not “incompatible” with “modern scientific knowledge;” It’s simply incompatible with the beliefs of evolutionary scientists concerning where we came from and why we’re here. Actually, it’s the evolutionists and their beliefs that are “incompatible” with “modern scientific knowledge.”
Dr. Krauss makes a rather odd statement that many an evolutionist mimics when he says:
Indeed, those who argue for a 6,000 year-old-earth are hypocritical whenever they get on a plane, use a car, watch television, or utilize any of modern technology based on science that also implies that the Earth is billions of years old.
I’ve heard these kinds of outrageous proclamations before. However, whether one believes the theories of cosmological, geological, or human evolution or not really has nothing to do with them understanding or applying the sciences that pertain to the building of airplanes, cars, or televisions, etc. Evolutionary science plays absolutely no part in the modern technologies that have given us such things. Yet this is often stated to fool the public into thinking that it’s essential to believe in evolutionary theory, else we all would never have any of the modern conveniences we currently have today. But nothing could be further from the truth.
Dr. Krauss again makes it a point to belittle those who disagree with him when he states:
Ham and his colleagues are nevertheless enamored with the illusion of science and the methods of science. Therefore they have created a museum that appears scientific, but that simply lies about the science.
Now we have Dr. Krauss referring to Dr. Ham as only “Ham.” He can’t even bring himself to call him “Mr.” Ham at this point. This is clearly done to belittle Dr. Ham in the eyes of the reader. Also, notice how Dr. Krauss uses the word “colleagues” to describe those who are involved with Dr. Ham and his museum. Actually, these “colleagues” are actually scientists. Dr. Krauss knows full well that by not referring to these people as scientists he can therefore imply to the reader (in a dishonest way) that the Museum is not supported by scientists, but only by those who know nothing about the sciences. These tactics ought not to be used by someone of Dr. Krauss’ status.
He further says that the Museum should be:
Condemned and shunned by the media, educators and government officials [because of] its basis in lies.
Let’s set the record straight. A “lie” is when a person tells someone something that they know to be untrue. However, that’s not the case at the Creation Museum. These scientists believe wholeheartedly, based on the scientific evidence, that the Bible’s Genesis creation account is the best scientific explanation for the existence of the universe, earth, and all living things. Therefore, they’re not lying at all. Yet, to Dr. Krauss, anyone who doesn’t believe as he does is lying, plain and simple. He can’t comprehend that he's wrong about his theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution, so he crudely labels those who disagree with him liars.
He continues by saying that:
The Creation Museum has to misrepresent the process and results of science, and lies about the scientific record.
Again, just what “results of science” show that the universe came out of nothing, caused by nothing, or that an ape ever turned into a man over millions of years? Apparently, thousands of scientists don’t think there are any such results, else they wouldn’t be going around telling people how the theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are theories that take an awful lot of faith to believe in.
In spite of some of the very unscientific things Dr. Krauss has said so far, this is perhaps the most disturbing and, I might add, downright scary statement he has made when he stated:
Alas, scientific fraud is generally not subject to legal intervention unless there is a financially injured party. But what of the thousands of young children who may visit the museum? Are they not intellectually injured when they enter a high-tech museum with an air of authority that claims, nonsensically, that the Grand Canyon was created by the biblical Flood?
So now Dr. Krauss wants to have the public bring legal action against any institution that teaches children that they’re created in the image of God, instead of teaching them they came out of nothing, caused by nothing, which means, essentially, that they really are nothing. And the next logical step, I'd imagine, is to bring lawsuits against parents who would teach their children that they’re made in God’s Image and to eventually have such parents determined unfit to raise their own kids and, therefore, have these children taken away from such parents.
The more I read Dr. Krauss’ articles the more concerned I am about his evolutionary/atheistic mindset. It appears to me that such a mindset has the potential to be a danger to our society and to parental rights in general.
He goes on to state that:
Not a single historical record supports any of the nonsense displayed in the museum regarding dinosaurs and humans cohabiting. Not a single astronomical piece of data supports a 6,000 year-old-universe.
Apparently, that’s not the opinion of thousands of scientists today and certainly wasn’t the opinion of a number of the greatest scientists throughout history such as Sir Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur, William Thomson, James Clerk Maxwell, Wernher von Braun, Lord Kelvin, George Washington Carver, Samuel Morse, and Matthew Maury, among others. On top of that, millions of people throughout the world simply do not believe in evolutionary theory at all.
He continues:
I am one of a group of scientists who will be preparing a short brochure pointing out the scientific fallacies of the museum’s exhibits.
I’m also in the process of publicly releasing my own comments on some of the “fallacies” that Dr. Krauss states in a book entitled: Atom: An Odyssey from the Big Bang to Life on Earth . . . and Beyond (2001). Some of his comments have to be read to be believed. I was truly astonished that any educated human being could actually hold to such beliefs.
Dr. Krauss even manages to bring The Constitution of the United States into his article by stating that:
The Constitution protects us against this. But as Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for Science Education, has emphasized, only we can protect ourselves against bad science.
Bad science? Yes, I’m certainly against the teaching of bad science, especially the teaching of human evolution as fact when the theory is still lacking the necessary fossil evidence to support it. The advocates of human evolutionary theory have spent billions of dollars in their search for “apemen fossils” and have come up with exactly zero for their worldwide efforts. Common sense dictates that there should be millions of apemen bones all over the place. But, thus far, all that has ever been found are extinct ape bones and dead human bones, but nothing in between. So the scientific evidence is literally screaming out loud and clear that no apes, anywhere in the world and at any time, have ever evolved into a human being. Yet, due to “bad science,” the bad evolutionary science that the public has been spoon fed for decades by our wonderful institutions of education, this nonsense that we humans evolved from apes over millions of years is still believed by far too many people in our society.
He closes out his article with some more strange and misleading statements when he says that:
Religious tolerance is important in modern society. But there should be little tolerance for religiously motivated fraud. Media, and government officials alike need to be clear that this project is misguided, as they would more easily do if the fraud was not religiously motivated.
Here Dr. Krauss is once again not referring to the people at the Creation Museum as “scientists.” They’re now just “religious” people who are behind the creation of the Creation Museum. He just can’t bring himself to inform the reader that there are scientists as qualified as he is who simply do not believe in cosmological, geological, or biological evolution. His view appears to be that if anyone doesn/t believe as he does, then they simply do not merit being called a scientist, no matter how many years they’ve spent earning their hard-earned scientific credentials.
And finally he states that:
Parents should be ready to bring lawsuits for any school system that uses public funds to bring students to this museum of misinformation.
This is a clear indication that Dr. Krauss is terribly afraid of anyone seeing the scientific evidence supporting creation. Evidence that shows the Bible’s Genesis creation account is a far more logical explanation for how everything got here than the totally impossible evolutionary ideas Dr. Krauss believes in. He knows that his evolutionary views will look even worse than they do now if the public starts to see the evidence supporting creation. This is something that he and other evolutionists are having many a sleepless night over. And all I can say is that he had better get used to it, because the number of scientists who reject evolution, based on sound scientific evidence, are growing every year and I thank God Almighty for that.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Evolutionist Questions His Evolutionary Beliefs
Dr. Kent Hovind (Creation Scientist) and Dr. Ben Waggoner (Biologist/Evolutionist) debated at the University of Central Arkansas in Little Rock on. February 10, 2002. Here are the very interesting opening remarks by Dr. Ben Waggoner. He stated:
Thank you, thank you all for coming out. I have an announcement to make at the beginning, and I sort of apologize for not . . . for not telling you this sooner, but it has to be said.
While I was doing preparation for this debate and looking up various things and trying to come up with various arguments and counter arguments for the points that I knew or that I thought that Dr. Hovind here would raise. And I started thinking about all of the . . . all of the arguments that he made in the previous debate, all of the things that he’d said, all of the points that he brought up that I just found myself incapable of refuting. And I did a good deal of background digging into the claims and the statements and the facts that Dr. Hovind presented, thanks in part to his very excellent website www.drdino.com, of which I can highly recommend. And I started to think about the way I taught evolution in the past. About all of the students of mine, some of whom are here tonight who I bullied, and brainwashed, and . . . intimidated, and generally tried to make feel bad because I couldn’t get them to convert to my own particular mode of thinking. And I thought about the way that . . . the senseless waste of taxpayer money for me to go in and act like an indoctrinator rather than an educator. And the way I always insisted that my students except this, because it seemed so right to me.
Well . . . well this is not particularly easy for me to say. It’s not always easy to talk with your foot this firmly planted in ones mouth, but I want to make a public promise right now. I really don’t want to make this a typical adversarial, name-calling . . . angry, mocking debate, the way I sort of remember the last one as having been. What I’d like to do is make this a learning experience because, from here on out, whenever I teach my evolution class, which I have to do because it’s what they hired me for, I want to add a Creation Science section to it. And I want to learn about what it is I should be teaching, because I come from a very secular background (loud applause). Thank you, thank you all of you. Thank you (the doctor was rather shaken so he sat down for a moment and then stood back up).
The high school I went to was a public high school in Louisiana; great education capital of the world that it is (the doctor was being sarcastic here). And things like this just weren’t covered . . . weren’t covered in my high school. One friend of mine was actually taken to after-school detention for saying the name of Jesus out loud. That’s what the atmosphere there was like, I kid you not.
And of course in my college education, first at Tulane and then at thee . . . the Peoples Republic of Berkley, California (more sarcasm and slight murmur in crowd), which is a little different from here I might add . . . just a touch. Of course I was not exposed to things like this.
So the reason I came here was not so much to defend my own case, because evolution is . . . far past anything that I could say to defend it.
What I really would like to do here is learn some of the things that I should be teaching. Some of the things I should be presenting and the ways in which I should be presenting it. To make sure that all of my future classes are even, and open-handed, and not intimidating to people of all persuasions who should happen to . . . who should happen to take them.
And so I really don’t have anything else to say. I ended up not presenting a particularly strong defense, and I hope this doesn’t upset the presenters. We were told to make this a debate. So in my own feeble way I will do my best to answer any points that Dr. Hovind here brings up.
But what I would like to do, and what I hope some of you will do, is simply to make this a learning experience for all. For us to learn about . . . well, in my case learn about what I need to be covering better which is . . . which is the creation view. And I know that wasn’t 15 minutes. This could mean that we all get out of here a little early . . . All.
A short response by Dr. Kent Hovind:
All right. Well thank you so much. I appreciate that. This is my 65th debate and that’s the first time I’ve had someone say they would like to be open-minded about it and I really appreciate that. And I will come at my expense to speak to your class anytime you’d like, okay? Let me know.
I’m sure it took a lot of courage for Dr. Waggoner to say the things he did. It’s great to see an evolutionist, especially a teacher at a university, admitting that much of what he believes about evolution is, according to hard science, really questionable.
I wish other science teachers were as courageous as Dr. Waggoner. Hopefully, as more and more scientific evidence comes forward showing how impossible cosmological, geological, and biological evolution really are, more scientists will stand up and make similar statements like those you’ve just read.
Creation talk at the Euclid, Ohio Public Library
The following is my report covering the creation talk I did at the Euclid Public Library on October 21, 2008. This was made possible due to Rebecca, who’s in charge of the Euclid Library obtaining its speakers. Many months ago I contacted her (the Library purchased two copies of my book) and asked if I could do a Power Point Presentation on the human evolutionary chapter of the text. She was kind enough to include me in the Forum for Thought schedule, which featured four other events scheduled during September and October.
I arrived at the Library at 6:30 and set-up my digital camera to record the event. Rebecca had already prepared the laptop computer, in which I inserted my CD ROM featuring the 33 visuals.
At 7:00 Rebecca introduced me to the crowd. I took the podium and immediately thanked Kevin & Vick Hayenga for all their help on the book and Power Point Presentation. I went on to explain my cancer situation (I had melanoma in July of 2007) and offered the audience my written testimony containing my long talk with God and how it helped comfort me during a most difficult time.
THE PRESENTATION BEGINS
The Power Point Presentation zeroed in on my book’s 6th Chapter: Apes To Man Evolution. But, for the first 15 minutes, I pointed out some of the book’s other highlights.
I gave an overview of the text; quickly covering the five chapters on evolution: Big Bang, Origin Of Life, Dating Methods, Dinosaurs, and Human Evolution. The last chapter entitled: Thinking We’re Apes Leads To Ape-Like Thinking, the most powerful segment of the book, is my favorite and I touched on that also.
I talked about how the theory of human evolution denigrates mankind, whereas a belief in the Genesis Creation account elevates the human race far above everything else God created in the natural world.
I mentioned that, since biblical times up until the middle 1800s, it was the creation story (God making everything in 6-24 hour days) that was basically taught throughout America with most people, even those in the sciences, believing it to be true. Then, after Charles Darwin’s On The Origin of Species was published in 1859, the tide turned and evolutionary theory took off and became the rule of the day.
I pointed out that the evolutionists are, for the most part, confused about some significant areas of science; one of which is their misinterpretation of what a “scientific fact” is. I read the dictionary meaning of a “fact” and went on to remind the audience that The Cleveland Museum of Natural History, through its many exhibits, is stating things as facts that are really only opinions. As an example I used the Museum’s Big Bang Exhibit, which states that the BB created “Time.” This, of course, is just an opinion, since not only is the Big Bang a cosmological theory not shared by all scientists, but for the Museum to state that it created “Time,” an entity we know absolutely nothing about, is simply ridiculous.
I informed everyone that, after viewing the Museum’s evolutionary exhibits, one can only conclude that the institution is promoting the belief that God is non-existent, that evolution is a scientific fact, and that all scientists believe what the Museum promotes. This is simply not the case as the book clearly points out.
CHAPTER SIX: APES TO MAN EVOLUTION
I finally got into the meat of the Presentation by showing a “apes to man human evolutionary progression” chart (a succession of drawings showing an ape on the left evolving into a human on the right). This is really the only place on earth where human evolution has ever taken place because, based on the empirical scientific evidence, it hasn’t happened in the real world. I pointed out that the chart’s “apeman,” the creature that’s supposed to be the link between apes and humans, is drawn in spite of there being no fossil evidence proving the beast ever existed.
I stated that the so-called “Common Ancestor,” which is supposed to be what apes and humans evolved from, has never been found, but is promoted by evolutionists as a creature that existed between 4 and 14 million years ago (a joke in and of itself because if one hasn’t found the common ancestor there’s no point arguing about when it existed).
I also brought up the fact that there’s absolutely no fossil evidence proving any of the great apes evolved over millions of years either.
Then I came to “Lucy,” the australopithecine (southern ape) standing in the Museum’s Kirtland Hall of Prehistoric Life. The creature is supposed to be our ancestor, but there’s no fossils showing the australopithecines evolving into anything else. And the way she’s presented in the exhibit, with human feet no less, is dishonest because everyone knows these apes had ape feet much like the modern apes of today.
I explained that the thousands of drawings in museums and textbooks around the world showing Lucy with human hands, feet, and looking very human-like are make-believe because there’s simply no fossil evidence supporting the australopithecines looking like anything other than an ape. I further pointed out that the artists who draw these misleading pictures are told to do so by the publishers so the theory of human evolution can be promoted in high schools and colleges.
I showed a picture of the famous Laetoli Footprints found in Eastern Africa in 1974. By all accounts the prints are perfectly human looking, yet evolutionists around the world insist that an apeman made them. I even showed the well-known Jay Matternes painting of apemen creatures who supposedly made the prints, which is just more evolutionary imagination gone wild.
I reminded the audience that, to date, there are no fossils showing any apemen (or missing links between an ape and human) ever existed. But there have been frauds perpetrated (Piltdown and Nebraska Man as well as the Neanderthals) by evolutionists in an effort to support their very unscientific theory.
For those who believed anatomical similarity (body parts of animals and humans being similar) supports human evolution, I demonstrated rather easily that just because we have arms and legs resembling those of apes, that doesn’t mean we biologically evolved along with them from some ape-like common ancestor. Rather, these similarities are due to God creating the apes on Day 6 of Creation Week and then passing on some of the creatures physical similarities to Adam & Eve. As a comparison, I brought up how humans built cars 100 years ago and, through the following decades, built newer cars and carried over the similarities (four wheels, doors, lights, etc.) to the current models.
Concerning the chimpanzee DNA closeness to that of humans, I stated that the DNA code is trillions of times more complicated than an entire nuclear submarine and that, to believe it made itself by blind random processes, is unscientific. I further used an example of the famous artist Rembrandt taking the same paint and making two different portraits; one a masterpiece and the other just so-so. I explained that the painter was the creator and the paint was the DNA, but that the portraits were totally different as far as quality was concerned. Two paintings, same DNA, same creator, but vastly different results. And that's what God did when he made chimpanzees and man: He used similar DNA, but made two very different creations: one a masterpiece (us) and another of a far lesser quality.
When I mentioned PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), that’s when a lady in the audience interrupted and I had to spend a few moments getting her under control. Actually, the lady was with a friend of my, Doug Rutti, and her behavior was a huge embarrassment to Doug who, by the way, felt terrible about her actions and couldn’t apologize enough when he called me the next day. He's great guy and had no idea that his lady friend was going to act in such poor taste.
I brought up PETA in order to inform everyone that some of their members believe human life is not more sacred or important than the lives of animals. I was trying to make the point that this is how morally broken people can become who doesn’t believe humans were created completely separate from animals and made in God’s Image.
I showed a remarkable picture of baby twins in their mother’s womb and pointed out how evolution denigrates their value and that it’s also a major reason why child killing (abortion) was legalized in America in the first place. This is covered in Chapter 7 of the book and contributes greatly to making those pages the most powerful ones in the text.
I brought up Ernst Haeckel, a scientist in the 1800s who believed that when a woman became pregnant she really didn’t have a human baby in her womb, but that the embryo was going through a biological evolutionary process where it began as a fish and then “evolved” into higher life forms before finally becoming a human baby. Talk about some guy going off the deep end?
I quoted some of the passages from Jesus Christ in the New Testament to show that we have nothing to lose and everything to gain by believing in creation, and that a belief in evolution gains us nothing and, if the evolutionists are wrong and God does exist, they lose their salvation.
As the Presentation drew to a close, I showed the last exhibit in the Museum which states that a human is “The Most Dangerous Animal.” In the book I show how terrible it is to send such a message to the public school kids who visit the Museum by the thousands year after year. I followed that up with my own version of how great humans are compared to everything else in the universe.
I made it a point to remind the audience that our armed forces are protecting them daily and that the pro-life people are out there trying to save the lives of unborn children. When I mentioned the troops, a young man, whom I’d say was a college student by his demeanor, asked why I brought up the military? I had a mind to throw him out on his ears for such a crack. However, I simply told him to hold his question till after I finished.
I closed with the poem that’s in Chapter 7 of the book. It summed up nicely what I had talked about concerning the follies of human evolution.
The Presentation lasted 45 minutes. Then I took some questions from the audience.
QUESTION & ANSWER SESSION
This lasted 22 minutes. For the most part, the questions were not directed toward the Presentation, but more or less attacked the Bible and its Genesis Creation account. This is typical of those who’ve been indoctrinated by evolutionary theory. They've just seen a number of powerful reasons to dismiss evolution and jump on the Creation bandwagon. But due to a mind-set that tells them to keep believing in human evolution at all costs (because to be a descendant of an ape-like creature is something to be proud of, while being made in God’s Image is something to be ashamed of), they basically ignored everything I said and attacked the messenger. This, sadly, is how many Americans today are reacting to the creation story.
The first question was asked by a young man whom I believe was a college student. He wanted to know why I linked evolutionary biologists with PETA? Actually, I did nothing of kind. I only pointed out that PETA, an animal rights group, is primarily made up of evolutionists, but not that they’re biological evolutionary scientists, although some of them very well could be.
The man was very upset and I had a difficult time trying to explain to him that Matt Prescott (PETA representative) was on the Dennis Prager Radio Program where he promoted the idea that when 6 million chickens are killed daily in America for food, that's just as evil as the Nazis murdering 6 million Jewish men, women and children during World War II. I mentioned this during the Presentation to show how morally warped a person’s mind can become if they believe they’re an animal.
As I tried to answer his questions, there were those in the crowd who began to speak out of turn. They’d blare out things without the slightest concern for myself or others in attendance. I quickly made it a point to calm them down, which had to be done a number of times throughout the evening. Of course, that should be no surprise, since the majority on hand were evolutionists who flat-out resented everything I had to say.
The next question came from a balding man about 60. I saw him a week earlier at the library when he showed a film about a political cartoonist named Paul Conrad. He seemed happy when he walked in to hear my talk; happy, that is, until he started getting very loud and completely out of order.
He correctly stated that I said humans were made in God’s Image, but then began to ramble on about God loving His apples more than He does mankind. I had no idea what he was talking about, although I’m sure there’s something in the Bible he’s referring to even though he’s obviously confused about what Scripture is actually saying.
So I didn’t answer his foolish questions. But then he blared out something about Noah’s Ark. Then he went on and asked where Adam & Eve’s sons got their wives from? After some more rambling by this man who obviously didn’t take his medication, I simply told him they got wives from their sisters. This really got him going. He blared out that that was illegal (incest). I explained that it wasn’t an illegal act until during the time of Moses. He began once again to rant and rave about God and His apples, so I decided it better to move on.
Next an elderly woman in the front row asked how long ago dinosaurs lived? I told her that no geologist could prove to anyone that the earth is old enough to support the belief that these great beasts lived tens of millions of years ago.
At this point I explained that we have two models of how everything got here and that evolutionary theory only denigrates us while the creation story elevates mankind.
The Non-Medicated Man blared out once again about God and His apples, but I simply ignored him. I wanted to keep him out of any further conversations if at all possible.
An articulate lady in her 60s, who was sitting on the other side of the room with the NM Man, said she was a Christian and evolutionist. Then she challenged something I said during the Presentation. She stated that, when she was in school, there were students shooting students just like today, which is something I implied didn’t happen decades ago because the schools still taught the children they were created by God and were not just an evolutionary bi-product.
I doubt very much that what she was saying was true, but I didn’t press the issue because it wasn’t the time or place. However, I’m certain that if I took the time to check the records of school shootings back in the 50s & 60s, there would be only a handful compared to what’s happened in any two decades since. She went on to ask what the problem was with evolution? A question I didn’t get a chance to answer.
A neatly dressed man in his 40s (whom I believe was Doctor Keiper from The Cleveland Museum of Natural History) stated that Galileo said: “The Bible tells us how to get to Heaven, not how the heaven’s go.” I didn’t comment on that, but I could have answered that the Bible may or may not tell us how the heaven’s go at present, but it certainly tells us how the heaven’s got here in the Book of Genesis: God simply created it.
He said that I claimed the Museum tells people that God doesn’t exist. I merely stated that when people see the Museum’s evolutionary exhibits, they cannot leave the building without thinking the Museum is telling them God doesn’t exist. The Museum tells its visitors that the universe came out of nothing, caused by nothing. It proclaims to everyone that life came from non-life and that apes evolved into humans. Obviously, that’s not what the Bible, God’s Word, promotes. So, in essence, if the Museum is telling people God had no part in the creation of anything in the universe, then it’s common sense that the Museum is saying God really doesn’t exist at all.
People started to blare out things at random. One girl, I believe another college student, complained that I said there was a sign in the Museum that actually stated: “God Doesn’t Exist.” Perhaps she didn’t hear my answer when I addressed the issue, but she was rather agitated like most of the other questioners throughout the evening.
An elderly woman said that the Genesis Creation account doesn’t mean 6 24-hour days. I said that any Hebrew Scholar would state that the writer did mean 6 normal days in spite of what many secular people say.
Another college student asked me what my take on religion was? I said that, as a Christian, there’s no other religion. I should have elaborated further and told him that, whatever religion one believes in, they must stand by it and not be afraid to say that other religions are wrong. A person who doesn’t do that ends up compromising their religion to the point where it’s not worth even believing in.
He also mentioned the Crusades, which is something a lot of atheists do. It’s their way of bashing Christianity and comparing it to other religions that have butchered and murdered people throughout the ages.
But I reminded him of the Nazis and Communists, who caused untold havoc of their own. These groups were pure evolutionary thinkers if ever there were any. He got rather riled and answered back: “Do you really believe that?” I told him I did and, with that, he and his friends left. Conclusion: the truth hurts, and those who have their minds made up have a tendency to run away from the truth when it hits them square in the face.
I stated that evolutionists want to be animals as opposed to being made in the image of God. An elderly lady named Barbara (with my friend Doug Rutti) blared out: “Where did you get that people want to be animals?” I could only imagine that Doug was gritting his teeth at the rudeness shown once again by his guest. I responded by saying that evolution does not glorify man and that the age of the evolutionary mind-set is the downfall of humans. However, she responded that “sin” was mankinds downfall and I certainly agreed with that.
Barbara also asked what my interpretation of the word “Literal” was? I said that it was a misunderstood word in our society today. I brought up the great film Gone With The Wind, which she didn’t seem to have ever heard of even though she's 69. That alone almost sent me over the top. However, I kept my cool and said that when Scarlett O’Hara told Rhett Butler that her heart was breaking for him (which I don’t think she told him, but I was just trying to give an example of the word literal), she didn’t actually mean her heart was physically breaking. Not at all. But when someone makes such a statement they “literally” mean that they’re feeling emotionally terrible, since they’re so much in love with someone who may not love them. When trying to determine the literal meaning of what a writer, when using a word or a phrase, is trying to convey to the reader, one needs to just ask themselves: “What is the writer trying to tell me?” That’s the way we determine what any writer literally means when they write something.
I told the audience that if the Genesis writer were here today, he would tell us he meant 6 24-hour days (as opposed to billions of years) and would wonder how anyone could possibly think otherwise.
I reminded the audience that, just because a scientist says something, it doesn’t mean “science” says it’s so. This is something I elaborate on in my book, and it’s extremely important that people are made aware of this.
A man a few rows back sarcastically tried to discredit the Bible by asking how many translations have there been throughout the ages? Again, here was another question attacking God’s Word, but overlooking all of the problems with evolution I pointed out during the talk.
I told him that what he was asking was a whole new topic, but that there’s plenty of manuscript evidence available supporting the Bible’s translations as being accurate. I even mentioned the Dead Sea Scrolls and how they, when finally deciphered, helped to confirmed the Bible’s stories.
The same elderly lady in the front row who asked a question earlier, wanted to know if I believed dinosaurs lived with Adam & Eve and, if so, how did people survive without being killed by these huge beasts? Of course, I told her that dinosaurs did live with Adam & Eve and other people, and that the animals were probably just hunted down and killed by humans.
She was confused on how humans could harm dinosaurs? But I simply told her that 100 people could easily kill a huge creature if they put their minds to it.
The lady in her 60s again chimed in by stating that “facts” are something assumed to be true at the time, but they could be changed when more evidence comes along. She said facts are “a best guess,” which is totally untrue and I even showed the audience the definition of a “fact” to prove my point.
She mentioned that, as a kid, she was taught how the mountains rose up due to tectonics. It was considered a "fact" in her day. I said the scientists had no business stating it was a fact because its basically impossible to prove what actually caused the mountains to rise up. However, she’s an evolutionist and her mind-set is an example of how they change the rules to fit their evolutionary worldview.
I explained that “Origin Science,” science that has taken place in the past unobserved by man, is much harder to prove than “Operational Science,” science taking place in the present.
I pointed out how Dr. Lawrence Krauss, an avid evolutionist who goes around bashing creation scientists for believing in Genesis, was being dishonest when he wrote an article in the Cincinnati Enquirer in 2007 during the opening of the Answers in Genesis Creation Museum in Kentucky. Never in Dr. Krauss’ article did he tell the reader that thousands of scientists around the world support the Creation Museum. Instead, he made it seem like no scientists believe in creation and that all believe in evolution when nothing could be further from the truth.
The same man who questioned the Bible’s translation accuracy asked why so many dinosaur bones are located ½ mile beneath the surface of the earth? I simply stated how the global flood of Noah could easily have deposited bones in areas prior to millions of tons of rock burying them.
I kept reiterating that science cannot prove which model is the one that got the universe, earth, and all life into existence, so why would anyone bother believing in evolution; a theory which only serves to denigrate mankind? I reminded the audience that most evolutionists are “secular humanists/atheists,” which is what I’ve learned during the past five years of writing my book.
The woman in her 60s again raised her hand. I addressed her as “young lady” and she, for whatever reason, didn’t like that label and let everyone know she’s 10 years older than me. But she was offended, if you could believe that, for my referring to her the way I did. Anyway, she said she was a Christian and evolutionist, which is actually more confusing than being just a hard-core evolutionist and here’s why. At least true atheists/evolutionists believe God doesn’t exist. They read Genesis and agree it means 6 24-hour days, but that it’s simply wrong because the universe is billions of years old and apes evolved into humans. So, in that regard, they don’t misread the Bible like the Christian/evolutionist does who thinks Genesis refers to billions of years and biological evolution.
I asked her why she believes in human evolution, even though the “common ancestor” has never been found? She said that in various fields of science the evidence for evolution is “persuasive.” Of course, it isn’t. But I have to believe that this woman, like a lot of people in America today, are simply hooked on the belief they came from an ape and no amount of scientific evidence is ever going to convince them otherwise. Too bad.
She tried to ask me something about Moses and the population of the earth since his time. She thinks there couldn’t possibly be 6 billion people on the planet if the earth is only thousands of years old. And she was confused how the human race could be so advanced after so short a time. She must be thinking that, millions of years ago, apemen were wandering around blaring out “Ugs” during the “evolution” of language, which is something she probably got from watching those evolutionary programs on the Discovery Channel. But I told her that Adam & Eve were created with intelligence, just like the Bible says.
That basically was the end of the Q&A session. I went into the audience and shook hands with some folks, including the very rude Medicine Man.
PARTING COMMENTS
Considering this was my first ever Power Point Presentation, which lasted over an hour in front of a hostile audience no less, I’d say it was a success. Obviously, after watching the video, there’s room for much improvement, and I’ll be writing a report concerning that also. For now, I’m anxiously looking forward to my next talk on this most wonderful topic.
I appreciate Rebecca allowing me to do this event. Mine was the last of the five-part Forum For Thought series and she informed me that it drew the most people; albeit, mostly angry ones.
I know that, in the future, I’ll be facing the same type of combative folks who just can’t stand anyone telling them they’re made in God’s Image and that they didn’t evolve from any ape-like creature over millions of years, which is something The Cleveland Museum of Natural History keeps telling the public every day, year after year.
God Bless and thanks a million for reading this report.
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Bible-Bashing at The Cleveland Museum of Natural History
If there ever was a reason why I must keep attending lectures held at the CMNH, the talk on May 8, 2009 is it.
The speaker was Dr. Robert L. Park, atheist and physics professor at the University of Maryland. Dr. Park is the author of: Superstition: Belief in the Age of Science (2008).
After taking my seat in Murch Hall I noticed a woman reading his book. I figured she was searching for reasons to not believe in the Genesis Creation account or God for that matter.
The crowd was one of the largest I ever saw at the Museum. In fact, the auditorium was ¾ full. I found that very interesting. But the reason is simple: people will flock to hear a man tell them God is a myth because they want to be free from the Bible‘s moral laws.
I recognized a man who threw a fit at my Euclid, Ohio creation talk in October of last year. However, he didn’t say a word toward Dr. Park because he obviously liked what this God-hating atheist had to say.
The following is a summary of what took place during the 81 minutes that Dr. Robert Park spoke.
Bible Bashing Time
Dr. Park began his talk by honoring pale anthropologist Tim White. He said that Dr. White found the oldest homo sapiens (160,000-years-old) when it was thought that the oldest were just 35,000 years. He mentioned other points of interest such as:
*Civilization (defined as when writing began) is at most 10,000 years old.
*Scientists are using DNA to trace the migration of human evolution to a particular part of Africa.
*Scientist Charles Collins discovered the laser and also got the Templeton Prize; an award originally given to people who made great progress in religion. It’s named after Sir John Templeton. Mother Teresa was the first to receive the award in 1973. But it has been given to a variety of people. From 1999 it was basically awarded to scientists.
Dr. Park pointed out other things, but I’ll focus on some of the statements he made that really showed his and The Cleveland Museum of Natural History’s very obvious atheistic agenda.
He stated: Superstitious means that you would hold beliefs in the Supernatural.
*By definition, to believe in God of the Holy Bible is “superstitious.” However, there’s a world of difference in believing what the Bible says compared to putting faith in a rabbit’s foot or some other good luck charm. Archeological discoveries are forever coming forward showing how accurate the Bible is when it comes to history. There’s also the numerous accurate prophecies concerning Jesus Christ made many years before His appearance, not to mention the scientific statements in the Bible pointing out that the earth is round, hangs in space, and that the universe had a beginning. So a belief in God of the Holy Bible comes with a lot more credibility and therefore ought not to be included in your average superstitious beliefs that so many people adhere to.
He stated: Scientists are normally not at all superstitious.
I don’t know if that’s true or not. However, from my research over the past 5 years, I’d say that evolutionary scientists are certainly committed to their beliefs and usually ignore any evidence showing evolutionary theories to be false or evidence that demonstrates the Bible’s Genesis creation account to be true.
He stated: Every observable effect has a physical cause.
This is a remarkable statement that’s actually countering The Cleveland Museum of Natural History’s Big Bang Exhibit. Think about it? Dr. Park knows that all evolutionists believe that billions of years ago there was absolutely nothing in existence. So if that’s the case, where did the “physical cause” come from to produce the Big Bang? If he really believes what he said, then the universe shouldn’t be here due to no cause being available to get it started. I’m wondering if anyone in attendance, beside myself, cringed when Dr. Park made such an un-evolutionary supporting statement?
He stated: Causality also should have called for the death of superstition.
Amazing, isn’t it? Dr. Park doesn’t even realize that what he said should have been the “death of the Big Bang” which is the absolute beginning of all future evolutionary theories because, without it, nothing would be in existence. In essence, these last two statements by the speaker negated the Big Bang as ever really happening.
He stated: Every physical event has a physical cause. And things that don’t have a physical cause won’t happen. So it should have been the death of superstition and it’s obvious that it was not.
Dr. Park just kept digging himself into a deeper hole as he once again trashed the Big Bang Theory to my everlasting joy.
He stated: Scientists must have faith to go on with what they’re doing. But as a matter of fact that definition of faith has two definitions. The first is confidence . . . So it’s confidence since scientists don’t’ believe in revelation, it’s confidence that you can learn things by experimentation. Where as faith, in its other meaning, is belief without the need of proof. It’s revelation.
Evolutionists really detest the word “faith” in the obvious way it’s used because they’d be admitting they believe in something they can’t prove. And evolutionists are forever stating things to be scientific facts that are simply opinions. In this way they think they are separating themselves from those who have faith in religion.
Dr. Park uses the word “confidence” instead of faith as if this means he doesn’t still take things on faith. But he, and evolutionists in general, take everything about cosmological, geological, and biological evolution on faith because there’s not a single thing about any of these theories that can be proven to be scientifically factual. Think about it: can anyone prove that a planet or star took billions of years to form? That the Grand Canyon took millions of years to create itself? That an ape ever evolved into a human being? They can certainly believe these things took place, but they can’t prove any of these amazing things ever actually took place.
He brought up Archimedes of Syracuse, the Greek mathematician who lived 220BC.
He stated: For the next 2,000 years nothing happened! (Laughter). Why didn’t it happen? Well, as near as I can figure we were all off looking for the Holy Grail (Slight laughter) . . . But look! This is still going on.
This is very typical of evolutionists. Mocking the Bible, but not giving any real evidence to support what‘s being stated. Dr. Park is implying that, because people were thinking about religion, science didn’t move forward over the next two centuries. I don’t know how many scientific discoveries were made during this period, but I do know that science really began moving forward in the 19th century mainly because of scientists who believed in God and creation, many of whom are listed in my book: GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On? It was bible-believing men of science who’ve made the most advances in the world, but this is something the evolutionists are leery about informing the public about.
He stated: This notion that the universe was designed for us . . . This is a great theme of the creationists. That the world was designed for us.
Spoken like a true atheist/evolutionist. As is par for the course, evolutionists in general don’t refer to creationists as “scientists,” even though the ones writing the creation books, doing the lectures, and debating evolutionists (and mopping the floor with them I might add), have credentials in all areas of science just like the evolutionary scientists do. Dr. Park is showing himself to be dishonest in the same way that Dr. Lawrence Krauss and Dr. Richard Dawkins do. This goes to the integrity of the speaker. And if such a person is caught lying about very obvious things, why should anyone believe them when they promote truly remarkable and unprovable evolutionary theories?
Also, since the universe, earth, and all life upon it have now been proven to be magnificently designed, the new mantra of the evolutionists is that that’s evidence for blind, random, evolutionally processes as opposed to creation (everything having a designer). Meaning, if things didn’t look so incredibly designed, that would certainly be used as proof for evolution, as was the case with the human cell centuries ago before the discovery of DNA showed how unbelievably complicated it is. But now that the cell is known to be so wonderfully complex, that’s also used as evidence for evolution. Obviously, the evolutionists want to have it both ways.
He stated: Evolution is a slow process.
Slow isn’t the word for evolution, since it never really happened in the first place. But the evolutionists have to cover all the bases in order to get people to believe in their very unscientific theories. So they say that “evolution is a slow process” and that it must have taken billions of years and anything can happen when you have enough time mixed with blind chance. This, of course, is all they have to hold onto because, scientifically, the theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are falling apart as more and more evidence comes forward to support the six-day Genesis creation account.
He stated: Our brain and our bodies aren’t changing either. But there’s a reason why our bodies aren’t changing. Evolution is most rapid when you have an isolated population.
So even though “evolution is a slow process” it can be “most rapid” at times? Of course, none of what he’s talking about can be proven to be a fact. However, I doubt if anyone in the audience outside of myself seriously questioned what Dr. Park was stating here.
He claimed that animals could adopt to a specific environments on an isolated island. The Galapogos island finches were carried from islands by storms. Some of the birds had small beaks because they fed on small seeds. Other islands had finches with larger beaks who fed on larger seeds. He implies this was due to evolution. Evolution? They were still finches (birds), were they not? Just with different beak sizes. That’s hardly evidence supporting that one kind of animal can evolve into another.
Concerning our immune system which he says evolved to protect some people from the 1982 flu virus he stated: It killed an awful lot of people when it swept through. But what was left were immune.
I wouldn’t say that those who were left were “immune” to the flu. Perhaps they just didn’t contract it? And he’s also implying that evolution made some people immune to the flu even if they contracted it. But that’s hardly scientific evidence supporting an ape evolving over millions of years into a man as many a biologist would attest to.
He stated: There’s still a search for the Holy Grail going on and big secrecy about the whole thing . . . But nothing was happening because people got religious instead of sticking to science.
He showed a picture of Holy Grail. Like I stated earlier, I don’t know how much science moved ahead during the time period Dr. Park is referring to, but he’s trying to point out that since people were so involved in religion, that hindered them from delving more deeply into science, thus stunting any serious scientific advancements. This cannot be proven to be the case and my earlier statements make it clear that it’s likely he’s way off base with this kind of argument.
Concerning churches and their different doctrines he said: They can’t all be right, but they can all be wrong! (Laugh).
I’d say the same thing about the evolutionists and their amazing theories. If you put two or more evolutionists in a room and ask them where the human race came from, you’re going to get different views on how it happened.
On June 5 I received a letter from Dr. Johannes Hailer Seaside concerning his views on human evolution. I had asked him why there’s no fossils showing an ape changing to a man? Why don’t we have any ape men fossils? He more or less replied that there’s no such thing as “ape men” and that the “missing link” is a myth. In other words, he believes in human evolution, but he doesn’t believe it happened the way thousands of evolutionists think it did. Disagreements like this can be said for cosmological and geological evolutionary theories as well, to which I would say: “They can’t all be right, but they can all be wrong.”
He mentioned moral laws and put some of the Ten Commandments up on the screen and stated: I hadn’t looked at the Ten Commandments in years, so I dug them out! They’re mostly thou shalt not’s. Thou shalt not have no other gods before me, thou shalt not make any graven image, thou shalt not take the Lord’s name in vain, thou shalt not do any work on the Sabbath. What do these got to do with morality? All this is is a statement of who’s the Boss! (Slight laughter).
He mentioned those 4 commandments that deal with rules, but he never put up the others concerning moral laws: thou salt not murder, steal, commit adultery, bear false witness against thy neighbor, or covet what thy neighbor has. So he misrepresented the Ten Commandments either on purpose or through ignorance. In some way or another, misrepresenting the Bible is a common occurrence amongst evolutionists.
He stated: The moral statement of the Bible is the Golden Rule. And there is something like the Golden Rule in every major religion . . . Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
I’d have to agree that that’s a pretty good way to live in general.
He stated some rules that he felt were universal. For instance: 1) Loyal to the group 2) Respect for authority (3 Protection of the weak. Of course, without God as the rule Maker, who’s to say that any rules are universal? Without God, it basically comes down to who’s got the might to enforce the rules they want put into place. If an evil regime takes over the whole world, then they’ll set the “universal” rules and they’ll decide what’s good and bad. So the rules could be 1) No loyalty to any group 2) Don’t respect any other authority 3) Kill the weak. This is what you’ll get, and have gotten throughout history, when God is removed from the picture.
He pointed out that there was a study to determine if prayer worked. 180,000 patients were prayed for and he stated: They found that prayer had absolutely no effect except in one small instance. They had a small sub-group . . . And they actually told them that they would be prayed for . . . Made them worse (laughter). The explanation given for this was performance anxiety. (Loud laughter).
The idea that the audience would laugh with him (and not at him) at God is really sad. I was tempted to jump up and remind the crowd that they’d be the first ones to be on their knees begging God to save their son, daughter, father or mother is anything should tragically happen to them. What a horrible mistake it is to side with the likes of Dr. Robert Park and literally remove the one Source that could heal someone they really care for.
He stated: When you break this down, the point is perhaps the most important message to hear. And that is, THERE IS NO PLAN! There is no plan at all. YOU ARE FREE! You’re not hear to do something. You may choose to do something and I hope you do something good. But there is no plan.
He was basically telling people the ultimate message coming from the atheist/evolutionary mind: God doesn’t exist and there’s no Divine plan for us; there’s no absolute moral laws to follow; there’s no punishment in Hell for those that don’t put their faith in our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ; and that man can make his own rules and the heck with what the Bible says.
And the idea that he hopes “you do something good” was an odd thing to hear. In that, just what does he mean by “good?” If you remove God from the equation and His moral laws as well, then who decides what is good or bad? Attila The Hun could very well think he’s doing “good” when he raids a village, kills the men, and captures all of the women. To him, that’s good. But to me and to any sane person, that’s bad. But without a set of God-given moral laws, then who’s to say that what Attila The Hun does is good or bad? Apparently, this goes right over Dr. Park’s head.
He stated: Science has changed our world to the point where Homo sapiens change the environment to suit us. There are dangers in that and we have to worry about whether this is sustainable, and it’s not sustainable at the present level. And this is the big conflict that is developing stronger, I think in the long run, than the conflict over Intelligent Design and that is, that we are facing before Darwin’s time, and that is population . . .
It does appear, as if I didn’t know prior to his lecture, that Dr. Park has bought into the Al Gore “The World is Coming To An End” global warming scenario. Of course, I’ve been stating for some time that if a person believes in evolution, they most likely believe in human induced global warming and are supporters of abortion and same-sex marriage as well. When a person buys into one of those beliefs, they usually adhere to the other 3.
Concerning science, he stated: We simply have no other way to learn about this universe we were brought into.
No creation scientists believes otherwise. Yet Dr. Park, with such a statement, is implying that the evolutionists look to science to explain how things got here, but creationists don’t. Yet nothing could be further from the truth. I use science when I think of how the DNA Code came into existence and it tells me that, since it’s trillions of times more complicated and wonderfully designed than a fleet of nuclear submarines, it’s scientifically reasonable to conclude that somebody had to make it. It’s basically scientifically impossible that the DNA Code could ever have created itself by blind, evolutionary processes. So, in essence, it’s Dr. Park who dismisses a creator for the Code when science screams, ever so loudly, that it must of had a designer and maker.
The lecture concluded to a rousing round of applause.
Questions & Answer Session
A man asked a question about some TV show with a foul name, but I really couldn’t make out what he was asking or how Dr. Park answered. But the point is, I wouldn’t have even said such words in public, which again shows how people like myself, who believe we’re made in God’s Image, act differently in public from those who think they’ve evolved from an ape
I asked: “Doctor, Isaac Newton looked at one of his assistants and said: ‘If you think the universe made itself you’re crazy. What do you think of that? Now Newton was a creationist. He said atheism is senseless. What do you think of that?”
He answered: I think wrong! (Laughter). Would you like me to go deeper than that? (laugh)
I said: “Go ahead.”
Someone asked him about humans and evolution and he stated:
He stated: If you would clone Homo sapiens from 160,000 years ago and he was sitting in this audience, you wouldn’t known him. Surely there have been some changes. And there’s some evidence that those changes have been greatest in the parts of the brain that have to do with language; probably what you would expect, I think. But pretty much we are the same as these Homo sapiens that were here 160,000 years ago. That’s in large part because we mix genes. We sleep around a lot (Slight laugh). And so there is no place on earth that is free from gene mixing. And that’s all it takes. You just have a little gene mixing, and that rapid evolution stops. When you mix genes from different environments, you adapt to a new environment. There is no plan. You’re not trying to change to something. Nobody’s trying to change you to something. You’re just adapting to the world you live in.
A man mentioned “String Theory.” The Doctor responded reluctantly by saying he didn’t have much use for it, but he didn’t want to offend any of his colleges that do believe in it.
Woman:
“Dr. Park, I’m wondering why you think that the majority of human beings believe in religion and superstition when science says otherwise?”
He stated:
We are easily programmed when we’re very young and there is a clear evolutionary reason for that. The one survival advantage we have over all the other animals is language. And so in those first years of life we learn language at an incredible rate. Tiny children are speaking sentences. And they start with nothing. They don’t know anything. It’s not like learning a new language. They started with no language. So this is a period when the brain is receptive in order for us to learn language very quickly . . . So what we do to the children is terribly, terribly important. What they hear, what we can try to teach them. Because most people are religious, most children get religious training.
I agree. The children are being indoctrinated with evolutionary thinking at a very young age and it becomes so ingrained in their mind that it makes it more difficult to deprogram them. Also, if a child is taught they evolved from an ape, then the chances are very high they’re going to grow up and support child killing (abortion) and even same-sex marriage. Whereas a child who’s taught that they’re made in God’s Image is far more likely to be pro-life and in favor of keeping marriage between one man/one woman. What they’re taught at such young ages will determine how they think on important issues when they become adults.
He stated: It seems to me, maybe we’re getting a little more polarized. The creationists are pushing off in one direction and the Dawkins and these people are pushing off in another.
He’s exactly right. The gap is getting bigger between what creation scientists and evolutionary scientists believe. And it all comes down to morals first and science second. The creationists are pro-life, pro-marriage (one man/one woman) and basically stand for the other moral values taught in the Bible. On the other hand, the atheists/evolutionists are almost always pro-child killing and want to make it lawful for men to marry men and women to marry women. They’re basically against some of the moral values taught in the Bible.
He stated: There’s been an awful lot of really good books written by atheists in the last few years and they all sold well. Mine was a bomb! (Laugh). It came out exactly when the market crashed . . . The timing could not have been worse. Beside which, another problem that we face right now in our society is the newspapers are crashing, and the books in general are not doing well.
This supporting of “good books written by atheists” is a statement that The Cleveland Museum of Natural History is not at all shy about telling the public that God is a myth and that all there is the natural world. This is something the Museum wasn’t doing years ago, but is very open about doing it now.
It’s not enough to show the public evolutionary exhibits, and the Museum knows this. So they brought in a man like Dr. Robert Park to basically trash the Bible in order to make the scientifically unbelievable theories of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution seem a bit more credible. However, in reality, this approach by The Cleveland Museum of Natural History is only going to backfire as more and more people are made aware of what’s taking place at this well-known scientific institution.
Dr. Park ended his lecture by stating: Hey, I really enjoyed it. Thank you so much. (Loud applauds) 81 minutes.
There was a long line of people at the ready to purchase the speaker’s book, which was in sharp contrast to what I experienced at my event in Euclid, Ohio in October of last year.
In the final analysis, Dr. Park did what so many atheists do when in front of an audience: they offer no real scientific evidence to support their evolutionary theories, and they present no evidence to show the Bible’s Genesis creation account couldn’t be true. Instead, they just mock Scripture in an effort to reinforce their atheistic beliefs.
At The Cleveland Museum of Natural History such a speaker is more than welcomed. Proving, beyond all doubt, that the Museum is now, with this latest “Leftwing Lecture,” clearly promoting atheism and is darn well proud to do so.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Back on the Airwaves
It was my pleasure to be interviewed by “Coach” Duane Risko on his television program: The Fire, May 12, 2009. It was videotaped in the Time Warner Cable Studio located in Brunswick, Ohio. We discussed the creation/evolution controversy and many of the points in my book: GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On?
Coach Duane did a terrific job of interviewing myself and Pastor Mark Valenti, a regular on the show, for 56 minutes and it was truly an honor to be on TV with such dedicated men of God.
On June 16 I was a guest on the Ray Carr program (WCSB 89.3FM). We hit the airwaves at 8:15AM and finished up an hour later. We discussed: GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On? We even took some interesting phone calls.
A lady asked me if I was the “Sonny” who had the Sonny Hours Radio Program 27 years ago on WRUW 91.1FM? I assured her I was. The show featured “Oldies” from the 50s & 60s and I had a ball doing it.
A fellow named “Markie” called and insulted Pastor Ernie Sanders, a man who’s about as Godly as you can get. Pastor Sanders is forever preaching God’s Word and is a powerful local force when it comes to fighting against the child killing (abortion) industry. I defended Pastor Sanders against Markie’s rants, but his anger toward the Lord is only going to get him tossed into Hell when his days on earth are over. So we do pray for him to have a change of heart before it’s too late.
These calls demonstrate how the Ray Carr program, at times, drifted from the creation/evolution battle going on today, but it was still great to talk over the airwaves of Cleveland, Ohio during a drive-time slot on a Tuesday morning.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
Power Point Talking Once Again
It was a real joy to do my 37-slide Power Point Presentation for a group at Pastor Mike Valenti’s church in Brunswick, Ohio on June 28, 2009. Pastor Mike’s congregation believes the creation account in the Book of Genesis, which is in sharp contrast to what many of the churches in America hold to today; cosmological, geological, and biological evolutionary teachings.
I arrived at the church at 10:15AM. After taking the time to set-up my camera equipment to record the event, my Presentation finally got underway at 10:30. Including the Q&A session, it came to an end at noon.
Considering I was addressing a crowd of true creation believers, their response was far different from those at the Euclid Public Library where they bashed the Bible’s Genesis six-day creation account and were very rude while doing it. So this was truly a breath of fresh air in comparison.
Of course, I don’t mind telling the creation story to angry unbelievers. Not at all. In fact, they’re the ones that need to hear it most. But it’s just so interesting to see the completely different attitudes and responses one gets depending on the type of crowd in attendance.
On July 11 I found myself in Canal Winchester, Ohio at the church of creationist Bob Garbe. Bob attended my talk in Euclid, Ohio back in October. I sent him a letter stating that I’d like very much to come to his area and do the Power Point Presentation and he invited me down.
I spent the night at a Best Western Motel just a mile away from Bob’s church. The next morning he picked me up at 8:00AM and we headed over to his place of worship.
I met the Board members, of which Bob is one, and then proceeded to do the Presentation. It was an abbreviated version (7 slides) and lasted only 30 minutes. We sat around and talked a lot about creation and then Bob took me and a few others to lunch at Bob Evans.
Bob Garbe is a very interesting character. He’s one of a number of people who actually went in search of Noah’s Ark. He even loaned me a book entitled: The Explorers of Ararat: and The Search for Noah’s Ark by B. J. Corbin (1999). This 379 page text has numerous stories concerning the various groups who went looking for the huge ship that carried the most precious cargo ever hauled: eight humans and tens of thousands of animals that eventually went on to repopulate the earth.
One chapter is all about Bob Garbe and his exploits in searching for the Ark. It’s 17 pages long and, like the other chapters, makes for adventurous and exciting reading.
After lunch I bid my friends goodbye and headed back to Cleveland. On the way I stopped at a McDonald’s where I saw a 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow; a car very similar to the Silver Cloud II used in the 1960s TV series: Burke’s Law. The owner was returning from a car show in Columbus where he said 10 others Rolls’ made an appearance.
So my trip to Canal Winchester, Ohio was interesting in more ways than one, and I certainly am looking forward to more Power Point Presentations on this most fascinating book: GOD versus The Cleveland Museum of Natural History: Whose Side is Science On?
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
The Creation TV Show
Currently on Time Warner Cable (Channel 21) in Brunswick, Ohio The Creation Show, which I’m hosting, is being aired weekly. I record the program every other Thursday. The show is then played 8 times during a two-week period. It airs on Tuesday 6PM & 11PM and Wednesday 4AM & 11AM.
I cover a lot of topics concerning the creation versus evolution battle. The Cleveland Museum of Natural History is mentioned quite often on the program. I demonstrate how very unscientific the Museum’s cosmological, geological, and biological evolutionary exhibits really are when simply looked at from a scientific and common sense point of view.
Now and then a guest appears on the program who offers lots of insight concerning the creation/evolution controversy.
I recommend watching The Creation Show on the BAT (Brunswick Area Television), and feel free to email me your questions and comments.
God Bless
Sonino John Paul Scardelletti - A Christian
|
